South African National Committee for SCOR (Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research): 25th GENERAL MEETING, WASHINGTON, DC: 10-13 OCTOBER 2000

REPORT BY VERE SHANNON ON THE 25th GENERAL MEETING OF
SCOR, WASHINGTON, DC: 10-13 OCTOBER 2000
Introduction
I participated in the 25th General Meeting of SCOR in my capacity as Chairperson of the South African National Committee for SCOR, and also on behalf of the President of the International Association for the Physical Sciences of the Ocean (IAPSO), who could not attend SCOR due to other commitments (CLIVAR meeting in Italy). I was also there in my capacity as a member of the Nominations Committee for the incoming SCOR Executive Officers and as a reviewer of a new proposed programme, SOLAS.
Report of President of SCOR
It was evident from the report of the President (John Field) that SCOR has been very active over the past year, in for example:
  • SCOR participated in the evaluation of IOC/UNESCO
  • A new Executive Director was recruited to replace Liz Gross who was retiring after 20 years of outstanding service to SCOR. Twenty-three applications were received for the position, of which 5 were considered to be outstanding. (The successful candidate, Ed Urban, assumed office on 15 October 2000).
  • SCOR has been very active in its science activities viz in 3 major programmes JGOFS, GLOBEC and GEOHAB, in the development of a new programme SOLAS, in the CO2 Advisory Panel, in the suite of Working Groups and the 5 Affiliated Programmes, etc. etc.
  • SCOR was amending its constitution slightly to further improve functioning (e.g. to further facilitate inclusivity and the provision of advice).
Election of New Executive Committee
The report of the Nominations Committee (which was chaired by the Past President, Nick McCave) was presented and the proposals accepted by acclamation. The new Executive Committee is as follows:
Robert (Bob) Duce (USA): President
Julie Hall (New Zealand): Secretary
Wolfgang Fennel (Germany): Vice President
Roberto Purini (Italy): Vice President
Shizuo Tsunogai (Japan): Vice President
John Field (South Africa): Past President
Plus ex officio the Executive Director and the Presidents of IAPSO, IAMAS, IABO and IUGS (or their nominees). Further members may be co-opted – I gather that Cintia Piccolo (Argentina) was co-opted subsequent to the meeting for a further term (she will develop the "Bellagio" initiative on regional graduate schools of oceanography in developing countries) and also that Laurent Labeyrie (France) was co-opted to represent Marine Geoscience and Paleo-Oceanography on the Executive.
Ad Hoc
Finance CommitteeAn ad hoc Finance Committee (FC) comprising Vere Shannon (Chair), Julie Hall, Ilana Wainer, Patrick Buat-Menard and Liz Gross (ex officio) was appointed. It was tasked with the review of the SCOR finances for 1999 (including scrutiny of the auditor’s report), the review of the revised budget for 2000 and the preparation of a draft budget for 2001. The FC met on two occasions during the week and presented its report on the final day of the meeting, where the report was accepted by SCOR. The following should be noted:
  • SCOR has a total budget of the order of US$750000, of which $250000 is discretionary funds.
  • SCOR now charges an administrative overheads fee where possible and appropriate for new programmes/projects managed on behalf of other organisations.
  • $25000 has been provided for new Working Groups for 2001, which will enable two new WGs to commence work.
  • Country membership dues will increase by 1% for 2001 (CF ICSU base line).
  • It is essential that new funds be sourced to expand the discretionary fund base (which has to finance salaries, costs of meetings and travel and service the WGs).
Past Working Groups
* WG101: Influence of Sea State on Atmospheric Drag Coefficient. Report is to be published by Cambridge University Press (now in press).
* WG102: Comparative Salinity and Density of the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean Basins (Report reviewed and accepted for publication in Deep Sea Research).
Current Working Groups
* WG103: The Role of Wave Breaking on Upper Ocean Dynamics (started in 1993). There has been a further delay and the manuscript is not ready yet, but will be by 2001.
* WG105: The Impacts of World Fishing Harvest on the Stability and Diversity of Marine Ecosystems. Final report was presented. The SCOR/IOC Symposium of the topic was held in Montpelier (France) in 1999 and papers were published in a special issue of the ICES Journal of Marine Science. There was interest in the work from all around the world. Follow up activities: Conclusions re monitoring ecosystems was presented to GOOS, and the general framework was accepted. South Africa expressed its appreciation for the excellent work done by the WG. Having fulfilled its function, WG105 was disbanded.
* WG106: Relative Sea Level and Muddy Coasts of the World. The work is nearly complete, but the publication of the report was delayed by a year due to the illness of the WG Chair– publication now scheduled for 2001
* WG107: Improved Global Bathymetry. Although the work is virtually complete, the final report on this important topic is still awaited. (I stressed to SCOR that WGs must meet deadlines in future, and in the case of WG107 the tasks must be finalised prior to SCOR 2001).
* WG108: Double Diffusion. This WG plans one further meeting (in April 2001) and a final report is expected in 2002.
* WG109: Biogeochemistry of Iron in Sea Water. This WG was established following a SCOR Symposium on the topic in 1998. A peer-reviewed book documenting the spectacular advances made by this WG is to be published in the IUPAC book series (John Wiley). The book will include results of the Southern Ocean iron fertilization experiment. A suite of papers on the topic has just been published in Nature (cf. Julie Hall). The final activity of WG109 will be the production of a handbook on iron analysis.
* WG110: Intercomparison and Validation of Ocean-Atmosphere Flux Fields. Established in 1997 by SCOR in partnership with WCRP this WG has done some excellent work. Its report will be edited by Peter Taylor (Co-Chair), following the final meeting to be held in May 2001. Sergey Gulev and Peter Taylor are to be congratulated for doing such a fine job, which is of particular relevance to IAPSO.
* WG111: Coupling Winds, Waves and Currents in Coastal Models. The WG has spent its time planning the Workshop scheduled to be held in 2001. The output from WG111 will be in the form of a definitive book.
* WG112: Magnitude of Submarine Groundwater Discharge and its Influence on Coastal Oceanographic Processes. This WG has close links with LOICZ and IOC. Good progress has been made by members of this very enthusiastic and active group. The WG has a very good website, which will be a good model for other SCOR WGs. It is likely that the work on this topic will continue beyond the life of a SCOR WG, cf. possible IAPSO/IAHS Commission.
* WG113: Evolution of the Asian Monsoon in Marine Records: Comparison between Indian and East-Asian Subsystems. The WG, which operates in partnership with IMAGES, will meet in Sapporo in September 2001.
* WG114: Transport and Reaction in Permeable Marine Sediments. Enthusiastic Co-Chairs, well-focussed group with an excellent Website, the WG has submitted an article outlining its progress to EOS. A second meeting is scheduled to take place in January 2001.
* WG115: Standards for the Survey and Analysis of Plankton. As this WG has only recently found a Chairman and is still to finalise membership, there is no progress of substance to report.
* WG116: Sediment Traps and Th-234 Methods for Carbon Export Flux Determination. This WG is just getting going, so there is nothing to report.
* WG117: Synthesis of Decadal to Millennial Climate Records of the Past 80K Years. (Co-sponsored by IMAGES). No details about membership, but the WG did hold a Workshop, from which a report will be published in EOS.
* WG118: New Technologies for Observing Marine Life. No report, but there has been progress since the appointment of David Farmer as Chair. There will be a meeting soon in Canada. The WG is well funded by the Sloan Foundation ($100000 over 3 years) and will meet again in 2001.
Proposed New Working Groups
Five new WGs had been proposed to SCOR, and these were considered at the meeting. The South African National Committee for SCOR had assessed the merits of the proposed WGs and had submitted its consensus opinion to the Executive Director prior to the meeting. Similarly the IAPSO Executive had reviewed the new proposals prior to the meeting and the IAPSO representative (Vere Shannon) had synthesised these into consensus comments. During the discussion I wore two hats (SA & IAPSO) and presented both sets of consensus views to the best of my ability. (This was not always easy when at times the opinions diverged!). The SANC-SCOR comments were circulated in SA prior to the meeting and will not be repeated here, except where they differ from the IAPSO view. The IAPSO consensus views were only presented orally, so these are provided below for the sake of completeness, together with the SCOR meeting decision.
Sediment Fluxes & Budgets in Estuarine & Coastal Areas
IAPSO Comments:
  • Title is misleading.
  • Many of the issues may be more relevant to LOICZ than to SCOR. Possible joint SCOR-LOICZ WG?
  • If established, perhaps the group could meet at annual meetings of organisations such as AGU, EGS etc.
  • Is the capacity of the coastal engineering community adequately captured in the terms of reference of the WG (i.e. input from ECOR?)
  • The activity is potentially relevant to a number of countries including inter alia China, India and South Africa.
  • Important topic and majority of IAPSO Executive are in favour. Problem is that WG terms of reference are too broad
  • There is inadequate representation from SE Asia/China and Africa on the proposed WG membership which is very heavily US biased.
SCOR decision:
The proposed WG was considered important, but required modification and focusing. It was not accepted for 2000/1.Predicting Resilience and Recovery of Disturbed Coastal Communities in the Tropics (PREDICT)
IAPSO Comments:
  • Majority of IAPSO Exec. are not in favour.
  • Focussed but perhaps too narrow in terms of scientific content and regional applicability (should be a regionally research project, locally funded).
  • Is this really a SCOR WG activity?
  • Perhaps more appropriate for LOICZ (what are links with LOICZ?)
  • Most of proposed members come from Europe.
  • Conclusion: pass on to LOICZ.
SCOR Decision:
Divergent views expressed, but overall considered important. Main problem is that it is too regional. SCOR asked for the proposal to be revised for consideration next year, and stressed that the new proposal must be pan tropical.
Quantitative Metrics for Marine Ecosystems from Environmental, Ecological and Fisheries Perspectives
The proposed WG was introduced by John Field (the SCOR Executive reporter for this proposal). He gave a superb overview of the problems and issues, and for the benefit of non-biologists, a lecture on basic principles of marine ecology! The latter proved most helpful for the subsequent discussion. (IAPSO members would have found this very useful).
IAPSO Comments:
  • Executive members had very divergent views on this proposal, but majority were NOT enthusiastic about it.
  • It has a heavy French bias, albeit mainly relating to proposed Associate members.
  • Proposal as written gets into the political arena, although with removal of the eco-labeling component as suggested by John Field, this problem would largely disappear.
  • Objectives are not clearly spelled out.
  • Feasibility questioned by some Exec. Members.
  • Also of relevant to GLOBEC.
  • Good geographic and disciplinary balance, although perhaps too heavily biased towards fisheries.
Discussion by SCOR
This was a tricky one for me as the IAPSO and SA views differ. I pointed out my dilemma, noting that it was a South African proposal (and has the unanimous support of SANC-SCOR) drafted by a Frenchman, and that to make matters more complicated the L.J. Shannon listed as a potential member by Dr Cury was my daughter!
There was substantial discussion on this proposal. In general it was evident that there was strong support for the concept from a number of national committees. It was noted that the proposer (Dr Cury) is one of the most respected marine ecologists in the World, and that there were many individuals who would like to be involved in the work of this proposed WG. No overlap with GLOBEC was anticipated (complementary rather), but close links with GLOBEC were seen as important. The ecolabeling component was not liked as it was not viewed as relevant for a SCOR WG. Concern was expressed about the use of the term "metrics" in the title. A major criticism was that the proposal as written was too "top down" i.e. fisheries biased, and needed to be more "bottom up" i.e. fewer fisheries biologists and more biological oceanographers should be involved and the terrestrial ecological input strengthened. Brazil indicated its willingness to be represented on the WG.
SCOR Decision: The proposed new WG was accepted by SCOR, subject to revision (cf. discussion).
Marine Phytoplanakton and Global Climate Regulation: the Phaeocystis Species Cluster as a Model
IAPSO Comments: Consensus in IAPSO Exec. is to support this proposal. (IAPSO was more positive about this one than the other four proposals tabled).
  • Well written and focussed – very specific but with broad applications.
  • Feasible.
  • Phaeocystis is very important in the N. Pacific – but why just focus on this genus?
  • Topic is of relevance to global climate change and the subject matter is appropriate for a SCOR WG.
  • Timing: Can such a WG really address NEW issues right now?
  • Membership has strong First World bias – must be broadened.
SCOR Decision
: It was noted that the WG would have close links with SOLAS. Subject to some modification (mainly membership) it was accepted as a new SCOR WG.
Variability of Ocean-Atmosphere Fluxes
IAPSO Comments:
  • Subject matter is clearly very important to IAPSO scientists.
  • Balance within Exec. tips towards supporting proposal BUT several RESERVATIONS.
  • No focussed output product, proposal seems rather open ended.
  • Membership has a strong First World bias, like WG110.
  • Are there linkages with SOLAS and other initiatives? Not obvious.
  • Could be improved by reformulation. Present proposal is not well formulated as it does not show the difference clearly between what was in the WG110 TOR and what will be done by the new group, i.e. what are the benefits and likely achievements of the WG.
  • Overall, supported by IAPSO.
Discussion
: Sergey Gulev made a presentation on the proposal which greatly facilitated subsequent discussions. As a consequence I was able to comment that this was clearly not just an extension of WG110, but would address rather a specific problem identified by WG110 viz quantification of the uncertainties relating to air-sea flux variability. Overall, the proposal had strong support around the table, but was not over urgent. A question which the proposers need to consider is whether the work would be more suited to a SCOR WG or an open-ended panel, e.g. SOLAS-WCRP?
SCOR Decision: A revised proposal should be submitted after conclusion of WG110 (for consideration in 2001) for start-up in 2002.
Satellites, Oceanography and Society
Following on the symposium on this topic held in Lisbon in 1998 (Year of the Ocean) which was supported by SCOR (and IOC, WCRP plus 5 space agencies) and convened by Dave Halpern, a book containing 19 peer-reviewed contributions is being published by Elsevier.
JGOFS
Hugh Ducklow (JGOFS Chair) presented an overview of JGOFS – selected highlights and synthesis. Key elements were:
  • 20 nations have participated with 1100 research cruises (involving 10000 people) and over 2000 journal publications to date.
  • Over 2.5 million measurements of CO2 in the ocean have been made, and greatly enhanced information has been provided, e.g. on the Southern Ocean, which is known to be a significant CO2sink.
  • Continental margins appear to be a weak CO2 sink
  • Iron enrichment experiment in Southern Ocean was a great success and showed (a) slow response – 5 days, (b) enhanced photosynthetic capability and (c) clear proof of the role of iron in global productivity.
  • JGOFS time series in Pacific suggest that N. Pacific is undergoing a regime shift – at Hawaii there has been a switch from a nitrate limited system to a phosphate limited one, etc.
GEOHAB
The Science Plan is under review. As it stands the SP is too long and requires severe editing (shortening) prior to publication.
GLOBEC
Presentation was given by Manuel Barange, which showed that GLOBEC had made excellent progress during the past year.
Highlights:
  • IPO staff have been appointed (Director = Manual Barange; Data Manager = Hester Wilson; Office Manager = Charlotte Ireland.
  • Recent Publications: 2 Newsletters, 1 Report, 2 Reports in press.
  • Meetings: 2 SPACC, 3 WGs, GLOBEC SSC & Exec.
  • New Web page.
  • News data policy developed.
  • Sourced new funds from IGBP, IOC.
I expressed SA’s appreciation of the progress made by GLOBEC which is clearly a strong and dynamic programme.
SOLAS :Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Study
SOLAS is a new programme being developed jointly by SCOR-IGBP-WCRP. It has as its goal "To achieve quantitative understanding of the key biogeographical-physical interactions and feedbacks between the ocean and atmosphere, and of how this coupled system affects and is affected by climate and environmental change". SOLAS which is co-chaired by Bob Duce and Peter Liss, held an open-science meeting in Germany in February 2000. The meeting was well attended (250 scientists from 22 countries) and 12 countries now are developing national activities (SOUTH AFRICA-SANCOR – NOTE THIS PLEASE!). Subsequent to the meeting a draft science plan has been developed.
Bob Duce outlined the SP, following which Peter Burkill (SCOR Executive reporter for SOLAS) highlighted the comments on the SP received from reviewers appointed by SCOR. (I had been one of the reviewers for my sins). Overall the comments were very favourable and constructive. Following discussion the SOLAS SP was approved in draft by SCOR, and will be modified to take into account the reviewers’ comments prior to being submitted to IGBP and WCRP for their formal approval.
FOBGC :Future Directions in Ocean Biogeochemistry
A presentation on this IGBP-SCOR activity was made by Patrick Buat-Menard. The way forward was seen as follows:
  • There is a need for a new framework to integrate existing research programmes of relevance (i.e. follow on from JGOFS).
  • Plan for the next decade of internationally coordinated research on ocean biogeochemistry.
  • SCOR and IGBP propose to establish a small planning group (8-10 persons) to develop foci and tasks in more detail. SCOR appointed Peter Burkill as leader of the planning group (for which some funding would be available).
SCOR Affiliated Programmes
The reports of ATOC, IMAGES, Inter Ridge, iAnZone, at IOCCG were presented and discussed. Continuation of all of these as SCOR APS was approved.
IAPSO Report
I highlighted the essential elements contained in the official IAPSO report for 1999/2000 submitted to SCOR (Doc.6.4), while Cintia Piccolo spoke about the joint IAPSO-IABO Assembly which is planned to take place in Argentina in October 2001 (2001 – An Ocean Odyssey : Mar del Plata, 21-28 October 2001). This symposium, for which SCOR is a co-sponsor, has been very well planned and the sessions are likely to be of considerable interest to a broad cross-section of physical, chemical and biological oceanographers. I informed the meeting that the President of IAPSO had been doing a sterling job in raising the scope, content and profile of IAPSO science, evidence of which can be seen in the 2001 Symposium Programme. Also good progress had been made towards the establishment of a prestigious IAPSO medal, which would become THE premier international award for excellence in physical/chemical oceanography.
I also pointed out that IAPSO would be participating in, and having symposia at, the IUGG General Assembly in Sapporo (Japan) in 2003, for which SCOR co-sponsorship would be requested next year. (PAOLA/FRED, NOTE).
Disciplinary Balance within SCOR’s Activities
An ad hoc WG to review this had been appointed, and the Chair, Nick McCave, reported back on its findings. The analysis had shown that there was a fair balance between disciplines in the SCOR WGs, Programmes, and Affiliated Programmes, although there were no activities in organic chemistry per se (cf. marine pollution). I made the point that although the balance in the WGs is OK, the Programmes (GEOHAB, JGOFS, GLOBEC) are strongly biological, and that I would like to see a higher profile from SCOR in key international physical oceanographic programmes, e.g. WCRP/CLIVAR, GOOS etc. Also in the more biological programmes, the physical scientists (who could make significant inputs) are under-represented, and the programmes are poorer as a result.
Progress Report on a SCOR Initiative to Enhance Graduate Education in the Marine Sciences in Developing Countries, Using a Regional Approach
Some progress had been made since a workshop, funded by the Rockerfeller Foundation, and the Bellagio International Study Centre in 1998. At the SCOR GM, a small group was appointed and met during the week of 10-13 October 2000. Its Chair, Ian Jones, reported back on the last day of the meeting. (South Africa unfortunately could not be represented on the small ad hocgroup, but as SA had played a major role previously in the "Bellagio" initiative, this was not seen as a problem).
Relating to the Regional Graduate Schools of Oceanography (RGSO) matters highlighted by Ian Jones were as follows:
  • Key elements – SE Asian proposed school
    • Advancing as an IOC Committee
  • Accept Rockerfeller report on funding – restrict its use to SCOR use for 12 months.
  • Agree to manage secretariat for 2 years if funded (i.e. at 1/5 persons.
  • Bellagio Group want to become an Affiliated Programme.
The task group proposals were:
  • Service the region, not a country.
  • Provide a research centre to retain locals.
  • Carry out regionally relevant research.
  • Promote excellence and ensure certification.
  • Funded by scholarships.
  • Instruction in English.
  • Nominate people to the SE Asian RGSO.
John Field has more details on the above of relevance to South Africa, and I suggest that SANC for SCOR should, in partnership with NRF, shall continue to be involved in this important SCOR initiative. (We have much to offer by way of experience, e.g. BENEFIT, and potentially much to gain also).
Administration Matters : Date of Next Meeting
The usual suite of business items was addressed at the SCOR GM, and details can be gleaned from the official report on the meeting which will be published by SCOR later this year. Of immediate relevance is the DATE AND VENUE FOR THE NEXT SCOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING.
VENUE: Mar del Plata, Argentina
DATE: 29-30 October 2001, viz immediately following the IAPSO-IABO 2001 Assembly.
Acknowledgements
I wish to acknowledge the excellent team work and advice provided by the members of the South African National Committee for SCOR and the members of the Executive Committee of IAPSO, which enabled me to contribute in a meaningful way to the SCOR GM. My participation in the meeting was made possible by funding provided by the National Research Foundation of South African and by IAPSO.
Vere Shannon
Cape Town, October 2000 (Report revised December 2000).